The Trouble With Weres

Hubby and I were discussing werewolf movies the other day as he forced himself to sit through Underworld: Evolution with me. My beef has always been that, cinematically speaking, the change has always looked too fake. And the only werewolves I really liked the looks of were the ones in An American Werewolf in Paris. Hubby’s problem is that moviemakers try to go too far with the freakshow. Why aren’t wolves scary enough as-is?

What’s your opinion?

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 29th, 2009 at 11:50 pm and is filed under Bitten in Two . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are 22 comments to this post.
  1. JalenJade Says:

    I’m interested to see how the Anita Blake TV series shows its Weres, I agree that most we’ve seen so far don’t look right, real or believable.


  2. Lauren K Says:

    i agree with all points made here so far.
    i also hope like CRAZY that they dont water down the weres in anita blake and just make them the actual animal, computer generated or no. i just think they should be left at that and they should stop trying to make hybrid type things. that was one plus i can give the twilight saga, they didnt mix that up, they were wolves or they were human. although, their “change” sequence was shit.
    although i am aware they will have to do this a little bit in anita as some of them can control the change… and also in the sookie stackhouse books with jason…


  3. Chloe Says:

    I have serious issues with ‘half-changed’ werewolves. One, they look horrible and not in a horrorfying way. Two, it makes no sense for them to be between forms. Three, have I mentioned they’re really ugly.

    Half the reason people like werewolves is because it’s humans changing into sleek four-footed predators. (That bear a resemblance to our cute puppies.)
    Not into ugly hybrids.

    Aside from that though, I don’t have too much beef with movie/TV depictions, aside from how quick they change.
    Give me a few minutes of bone-crunching shape changing and I’d be happy or even not showing it on-screen but it has to be a quick morph or a slowish one. It’s um… not supposed to be pleasant.

    My only disclaimer to all of the above is if they’re shapeshifters, in which case they can be as quick as they please. Shapeshifting feels a bit more magical and a bit less “It’s a civilised human being turning into a savage beast” and more “It’s a human. Whose other skin is that of an animal”.


  4. SanityAna Says:

    I think the differences existing in myths between these creatures keeps readers and watchers interested because you’re never quite sure what ‘myth’ they will use to illustrate their characters. For example Blood and Chocolate the movie (not the book) has an interesting take on the transformation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEwfZPT6ZfE about 3 mins in), going for a more higher plane spiritual transformation as opposed to George’s in Being Human (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-sDU05gAmQ). Personally I think it is a lot easier to watch the Blood and Chocolate transformation then George’s.


  5. Tori Says:

    Just as FYI Anita Blake isn’t going to tv for now from what was on LKH blog a few posts ago.

    I like the larger canine wolf shape myself. I know it’s not traditional horror look but I like it.

    Then again I dont like scary movies much and the half shape with all the sfx just scares me sometimes. I’m not generally scared of actual wolves- they tend to have a bad rap overall. Best trained dog I ever had was 3/4 wolf — and he trained himself.

    Rambling again.. Have a happy day!


  6. Vale Says:

    I think too that they should try to leave them more similar to the actual wolves – which yes, are scary enough as it is – and leave the freakier versions for the half-changed.
    Also, moviemakers often picture weres in werewolf-men form like the half-changed, but in the meantime said were-men seem to only have the beast’s instincts left, and absolutely no reason. Wasn’t the difference between weres and animals supposed to be the fact that weres still have some of their humanity left, even when in were form? Or am I mistaken?


  7. jrardin Says:

    Maybe we’re asking too much of movie makers, JalenJade. Perhaps the technology just isn’t there yet. But I think they can pull it off.

    Interesting, Lauren. My hubby’s point was also that Hollywood thinks we need to be awed by something bigger and badder every time we go to the movies. But sometimes when you pull back and get real it can be even scarier. I think he might have something there.

    I’m definitely into the bone-crunching bit, Chloe. I can’t imagine it would ever be pleasant. Magical, yes. Easy, no.

    Cool. Thanks for the links, SanityAna.
    For some reason I couldn’t bring your second one up. Let’s see if it’ll work here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-sDU05gAmQ

    Thanks for the input, Tori!

    I agree, Vale. My impression was always that some humanity was left inside the werewolf, always warring with the animal instinct, which was generally much stronger once the change happened. But authors will play!


  8. Marissa Turner Says:

    I like my wolves to look like wolves. Bigger and heavier and a bit scarier as you can see the human intent in their eyes when they look at you, but they’re freaking wolves.

    I don’t like the biped, because the ability to walk upright for long distances is what marks humans, and were-animals of any kind aren’t human anymore. So why make them look like that?

    Of course, I also think the human part is what makes a werewolf a dangerous beast, but that’s just me. I’ve always like animals more the humans, as animals are honest.


  9. Becky Says:

    This is a great discussion after watching “Werewolf” last night on the SyFy channel. I sat there laughing at the way they portrayed the transformation itself because the actors looked like they had a bad case of poison ivy with pointy ears, claws and a Halloween dog nose painted on them. The story left me with the impression that the transformation was really long (like a day or two) and abnormally painful. At the very end of the movie though was this great moment where the last standing soldier looked over to the knoll from where he was gassing up his car and there were two wolves standing there watching him. Every viewer knew it was the hero and his mate that had survived the blood bath. One moment with a real animal gave me more goosebumps than the entire movie with black paint noses and fangs.


  10. Sophie Says:

    Have to agree with the general consensus here, i think having an actual wolf rather than the wolf man thing has always seemed more captivating to me! Maybe i just prefer not to see a man running around in a werewolf suit! You only have to watch skinwalkers to see the weird things that filmmakers come up with! As for blood and chocolate I liked what they did with the wolves, though i agree the transfomation could have been better. Wolves are scary enough on their own without the CG!

    I thought Anita Blake was gonna be made into a film, musta got mixed up! Kinda glad it’s not going to be made for now, i have issues with book adaptations, and i honestly don’t think the books will make sense on screen! Apologies for the rant x


  11. Penny W Says:

    Personally some of the scariest movies I’ve seen are ones where you don’t actually see the monsters.
    Wolves are not incrediably scary, as most of us can see a wolf (or dingo) like traits in our pet dogs.
    That and the transformations on screen are normally crap, and the resulting animal is normally more funny than scary.

    Have Bite Marks to read :-D


  12. Gareth Says:

    Personally I always like the Jaws approach. IE You don’t see the beast just what it does. That scared the hell out of me for years. Monster flicks either seem to go for the physical wolf or a mockery half man, half beast which doesn’t work very well.


  13. Emma Says:

    I think cinematically speaking something is always lost in translation.
    I agree with what has been said already: Their either too much like an extra out of Star Trek: The original series, or just too gory…what is it with todays movie makers, that unless their making us loose our popcorn they aren’t happy.
    I’m not even sure I’ve found anything believable, even genre busting series BTVS was a little more sesame street than actually believable.


  14. Meryl Says:

    I think for things such as werewolves there should either be a scary transformation. I liked the werewolf transformation in Supernatural, I mean there wasn’t really a treansformation but i thought it was interesting that they didn’t really change into a wolf but a different human. I also liked the transformation for the werewolves in the movie Skinwalkers. I think for transformations like shapeshifters, etc. I think it makes sense to have a sort of mystical, more magical, transformation. I love the big gorey scary transformations and the mystical ones too, I can never decide what kind,it has to fit the movie and i just want it to be cool. I think the scariest transformations are when the monsters look more human or have a human aspect to them. I love what Eric Kripke is doing for the monsters in Supernatural. The Vampires and were wolves look really cool. But I have to totally agree with what everyone is saying though, something gets lost in translation were it looks weird or it doesn’t look like a believeable transformation it looks totally fake, but i think that it is partially the CGI people’s fault. (sorry its so long).


  15. Onyx Says:

    i have issues with shapechanging full stop (were, magic, or genetic)… there is no way that the mass of a human (ranging from 60-100kg) can be compacted down to a wolf (according to wiki the weight range for modern wolves are 25-40kg)… where does the extra mass go? if someone could change into a wolf, their wolf form would have to be the size of a saint bernard or great dane… hardly inconspicuous. not to mention the physiological changes that would need to take place- ribs, the spine, and limb structure would have to be realigned to accomodate a quadrupedal form. i like the idea of it, who wouldn’t? but from a purely academic viewpoint, it doesn’t make sense. i think some of the problem with modern takes on the were-wolf mythos in hollywood especially, is that the film-makers are trying to go for the shock value rather than realism, so some of the terror that should be there is lost.


  16. jrardin Says:

    I like them on four legs too, Marissa. We need a clear distinction, I think. Otherwise we’re getting into weird crap like the Swamp Thing.

    So true, Becky. I’ve laughed my way through plenty of were-movies myself for that very reason!

    What do you think, Sophie? Do writers believe we’ll actually feel some sort of animosity toward real wolves after seeing the movie we’re describing, and that’s why they make their weres so mutated? And if so, how insulting! Like we can’t tell fiction from reality!

    I agree, Penny. I love the movies where you only see bits of the monster at first. Gives you so much more to anticipate!

    OMG, Gareth, Jaws scared the hell out of me! You’re so right!

    LOL, Emma!!

    I’m with you, Onyx. My practical brain has a hard time accepting the were-change at all. What I’d love to do is talk with a physician about how that could work. Would she tell you a person would just go into shock and die? Would she start talking about adrenalin surges and other chemical changes that might come into play to help a person survive such a transformation? It would be fascinating from a purely scientific standpoint to find out if, and how, such a physical change could take place.
    I’m guessing you’d always have to add some magic to make it work–but how much?


  17. Sophie Says:

    Very true, they probably think it’ll give the film more impact, though in reality it’ll probably just make you remember it for the wrong reasons! I think it would give you more respect for them as predators! Seriously don’t see whats wrong with a pack of proper wolves chasing someone, it would certainly scare the hell out of me!


  18. Melanie Says:

    My problem with werewolves aside from the fact that they look too fake when they change is that the change is not possible. It would require much too much kinetic energy and the body would probably spontaneously combust. That would make a good thing to put in the movies, though!

    A guy gets turned into a werewolf and he doesn’t have long to live because when he changes! KA-POW!! He explodes!!


  19. Gillian Says:

    One of the basic laws of physics is that energy cannot be either created or destroyed. My biggest problem with most movie/TV versions of shapeshifting (either by choice or phases of the moon) is that the energy is not conserved. As Onyx pointed out, you simply cannot make a human take the form of an average wolf. That extra energy HAS to go somewhere, so I’m more likely to believe in giant wolves (or any other animal) as weres than a standard size wolf.

    As for the changing itself, generally I’m over moviemakers going for the shock value. Yes, I understand it would be a long and painful process, but don’t insult my intelligence and disrespect my time by drawing it out. Watching someone scream at the camera for 10 seconds while their face bulges and pops is not something I’ve paid to see. Hint at it, make it more real by having someone in another room cringe and cry with every scream and pop wrung out of the shifter. Subtle is key.

    Another bug bear for me is the infection itself. Don’t writers understand concepts of incubation periods and progression of disease? The MOI (Multiplicity of Infection) would have to be ridiculously high for a victim to receive a swipe from a were-animal and then change themselves a few minutes later.

    Good science in paranormal stories just makes it that much better!


  20. jrardin Says:

    I’m convinced, Sophie!

    I don’t know if I’d laugh or gasp, Melanie, but either way I’d love it!

    Excellent points, Gillian. I especially love what you’re saying about subtletly. Worming your way into the back of my brain is a much more effective way to scare me than braining me over the head with a two by four. I’ll try to take that lesson to heart!!


  21. Emily Says:

    For anybody who has watched New Moon I thought the werewolves in that were actually pretty scary looking. Just like normal wolves but big.


  22. amber Says:

    I do like how they have the wolves in New Moon. When or if they do the Anita Blake show is on some of them they would have to do the half change because the really strong ones are able to do that. Other than that they shouldn’t have to change anything about them. If a wolf came up to me I’d be afraid with nothin else added.


Leave a Reply

My Books!

Once Bitten, Twice ShyOnce Bitten, Twice Shy (Jaz Parks, #1)
reviews: 192
ratings: 2019 (avg rating 3.75)

Another One Bites the DustAnother One Bites the Dust (Jaz Parks, #2)
reviews: 73
ratings: 1204 (avg rating 3.90)

Biting the BulletBiting the Bullet (Jaz Parks, #3)
reviews: 69
ratings: 1124 (avg rating 3.99)

Bitten to DeathBitten to Death (Jaz Parks, #4)
reviews: 54
ratings: 1027 (avg rating 4.03)

One More BiteOne More Bite (Jaz Parks, #5)
reviews: 46
ratings: 866 (avg rating 4.08)

More about my books >>

Become a Fan on Facebook

Follow Jennifer Rardin on Twitter
Sign up for email updates